Saturday, August 20, 2016

Shakespeare


Update: One should read the essay first.  Here, there's a great piece on the Tudor myth that is Richard III and some other points. Good backstory.

I just finished watching Richard III, an impeccable performance by Montana Shakespeare in the Park here in Spokane. It was a beautiful evening and I find that such a performance only enhances the word play and other subtleties in Shakespeare's work. 


In the end, it's not the overarching story that matters. For with Richard the 3rd we have a cartoonish villain, and yet even with that it reaches greater heights than many similar modern day movies and books that have similar cartoonish villains. [1] Why is this? The subtle wordplay and the hints at the frailties of human nature seem to do the trick [2]. 

I wonder why we can't see this more, and perhaps I need to go back to novels to give this a try: to have a better parallel story done through other means. Are there any good stories like this out there?



[1] Though many today would have such a villain in contrast with our hero who must fight and win (focusing on the hero, whereas here Shakespeare focuses on the villain, Richmond a sad sap in the back). 

[2] Again, even if some of this is trope, and this story was nothing more than a Tudor foundational myth. One even gets the sense that this was over the top on purpose. Some of the people "fooled" seem to almost be naive to a fault. This doesn't appear to be Shakespeare's style. Though I'll leave my questions out for later.


Enjoyed it? Share it via email, facebook, twitter, or one of the buttons below (or through some other method you prefer). Thank you! As always, here's the tip jar. Throw some change in there & help cover the costs of running this thing. You can use paypal or a credit card.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please comment to add to the discussion. Be kind. But let the democratic ideal lead you. And no spamming!